CloudMask E2EE for Education vs ZAMA: 2026 Comparison
CloudMask E2EE for Education is a commercial data masking tool by CloudMask. ZAMA is a free data masking tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best data masking fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Education institutions handling FERPA-regulated student data need CloudMask E2EE for Education because it encrypts sensitive information before it ever leaves your infrastructure, eliminating the risk that a compromised cloud provider or insider can access unencrypted records. Device-local key management and Common Criteria certification mean your encryption keys never transit through CloudMask's servers or anyone else's, which directly addresses the compliance posture FERPA auditors actually care about. This tool is overkill for districts primarily concerned with network segmentation and access controls; it's built for schools that have already experienced or narrowly avoided a cloud storage breach and want cryptographic certainty that student data stays opaque.
Developers building privacy-critical applications on public blockchains or untrusted infrastructure need fhEVM Coprocessor because it's the only open-source tool that lets you perform computations on encrypted data without decrypting it first, eliminating the exposure window entirely. The library supports arbitrary smart contract logic through Fully Homomorphic Encryption, meaning your data stays encrypted end-to-end in NIST Protect and Govern functions. Skip this if your team lacks cryptography expertise or you need a point-and-click masking tool for legacy databases; fhEVM requires developers to architect around encrypted computation from the ground up, not bolt encryption onto existing systems.
