Cloud Monitor (for Microsoft 365) vs Skyhigh Security Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cloud Monitor (for Microsoft 365)

K-12 IT teams protecting student data in Microsoft 365 environments should choose Cloud Monitor because it combines continuous M365 activity monitoring with automated detection of risky SaaS permissions, closing the gap between what happens inside Exchange and OneDrive and what happens when staff accidentally grant third-party apps access to student records. The platform covers DE.CM and DE.AE functions across login anomalies, file sharing patterns, and download behavior with 24/7 oversight, which matters when you're liable for FERPA compliance. Skip this if your district runs a hybrid environment heavy on Google Workspace or needs deep endpoint detection; Cloud Monitor is M365-specific by design.

Skyhigh Security Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with sprawling SaaS footprints will get the most from Skyhigh Security Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker because its multi-mode deployment model actually works; you can start with forward proxy for sanctioned apps, add reverse proxy for critical services, and integrate via API without ripping out your infrastructure. The platform covers seven NIST CSF 2.0 functions including continuous monitoring and adverse event analysis, and native connectors to 40 applications mean you're not building integrations yourself. Skip this if your cloud use is still consolidating around two or three providers or if you need equal strength in recovery and response; Skyhigh's architecture prioritizes detection and access control over post-incident remediation.