Claroty xDome Secure Access vs Cognitas CrossLink ZTNA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Claroty xDome Secure Access

Enterprise and mid-market teams managing industrial control systems or healthcare devices will get the most from Claroty xDome Secure Access because it treats CPS asset discovery and exposure mapping as a prerequisite to access control, not an afterthought. The platform covers ID.AM and PR.AA across NIST CSF 2.0, meaning you get genuine asset inventory before you lock down who touches what, and the hybrid deployment model handles both air-gapped and connected environments without requiring full network redesigns. Skip this if your priority is detection speed over access prevention; xDome's strength is keeping unauthorized users off the network entirely, not catching them after they're in.

Cognitas CrossLink ZTNA

SMB and mid-market teams replacing VPNs should pick Cognitas CrossLink ZTNA for its zero-touch deployment, which cuts the implementation friction that kills most ZTNA rollouts. ML-driven access policies and support for legacy applications mean you're not ripping out infrastructure to get zero trust working, just redirecting traffic through identity controls. Skip this if you need deep API-first architecture; CrossLink prioritizes ease of deployment over the policy granularity that enterprise security teams with mature identity programs demand.