Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Cisco Duo Remote Access is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Duo Security. Neeve Remote Access Agent by Cloudbrink is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Neeve. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best zero trust network access fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Security teams managing hybrid workforces across multiple cloud platforms will find Cisco Duo Remote Access valuable for its phishing-resistant authentication, which eliminates the weakest link in most remote access breaches. The solution enforces device trust verification before access is granted, addressing PR.AA identity controls that most VPN replacements handle poorly. Skip this if your organization needs deep network segmentation or advanced threat hunting; Duo prioritizes access decisions over post-breach detection and monitoring.
Neeve Remote Access Agent by Cloudbrink
Building ops and facilities teams managing legacy BMS and OT systems need remote access that doesn't require VPN infrastructure or hardware changes; Neeve Remote Access Agent solves this by tunneling directly to controllers from desktop and mobile apps through the Neeve portal. The tool maps to NIST PR.AA for access control and PR.IR for infrastructure resilience, meaning you get both authentication enforcement and segmented connectivity without expanding your attack surface. Skip this if your environment is primarily cloud-native SaaS applications or you need cross-platform VPN replacement for general workforce access; Neeve is purpose-built for the OT/BMS use case where legacy systems can't support standard remote access protocols.
Remote access security solution with phishing-resistant MFA and device trust
Secure remote access agent for legacy OT/BMS desktop apps via Neeve portal.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Cisco Duo Remote Access vs Neeve Remote Access Agent by Cloudbrink for your zero trust network access needs.
Cisco Duo Remote Access: Remote access security solution with phishing-resistant MFA and device trust. built by Duo Security. Core capabilities include Phishing-resistant multi-factor authentication, Device trust verification, VPN-less remote access..
Neeve Remote Access Agent by Cloudbrink: Secure remote access agent for legacy OT/BMS desktop apps via Neeve portal. built by Neeve. Core capabilities include Secure remote access to legacy desktop building systems and OT applications, Direct connectivity to OT controllers for desktop and mobile apps, Integrated user management and authentication..
Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Cisco Duo Remote Access differentiates with Phishing-resistant multi-factor authentication, Device trust verification, VPN-less remote access. Neeve Remote Access Agent by Cloudbrink differentiates with Secure remote access to legacy desktop building systems and OT applications, Direct connectivity to OT controllers for desktop and mobile apps, Integrated user management and authentication.
Cisco Duo Remote Access is developed by Duo Security. Neeve Remote Access Agent by Cloudbrink is developed by Neeve. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Cisco Duo Remote Access and Neeve Remote Access Agent by Cloudbrink serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both are Zero Trust Network Access tools, both cover Remote Access, ZTNA. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox