Circumvent vs Dow Jones Hammer: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Circumvent is a commercial cloud security posture management tool by Circumvent. Dow Jones Hammer is a free cloud security posture management tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cloud security posture management fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in cloud misconfig alerts will find value in Circumvent's alert correlation engine, which cuts noise by connecting findings across your existing security stack rather than demanding you rip-and-replace. It maps asset relationships and roots cause to business context, addressing ID.RA and ID.AM gaps that most CSPM tools leave unfinished. Skip this if your cloud footprint is single-region or your team wants a point tool; Circumvent's strength lies in multi-cloud complexity and DevSecOps workflow integration, which only pays off when you have the operational maturity to use it.
Teams with AWS-only multi-account sprawl who need fast remediation without vendor lock-in should start with Dow Jones Hammer; it's free, which means you can validate misconfig detection across hundreds of instances before committing budget elsewhere. The 448 GitHub stars and open-source model give you transparency into what the tool actually checks and the option to fork it if Dow Jones stops maintaining it. Skip this if your environment is multi-cloud or if you need CIEM and identity governance layered in; Hammer stays disciplined around infrastructure misconfiguration and doesn't pretend to be a platform.
