CipherStash Stash vs Tang: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
CipherStash Stash is a commercial key management tool by CipherStash. Tang is a free key management tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best key management fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs managing TypeScript services need CipherStash Stash because its zero-knowledge architecture means the vendor literally cannot access your secrets, plaintext, or decryption keys, even under compulsion. The cryptographic audit trail creates immutable proof of every access event, addressing both PR.AA and PR.DS in NIST CSF 2.0 simultaneously. Skip this if your team runs primarily Python or Go; the SDK strength is decidedly TypeScript-first, and retrofitting other languages adds friction that larger, language-agnostic competitors don't impose.
Teams protecting stateless services or ephemeral infrastructure in airgapped or hostile networks should choose Tang for its ability to bind decryption to network presence rather than individual credentials. The free, open-source model (670 GitHub stars) means you can deploy it without vendor lock-in and audit the binding mechanism yourself. Skip Tang if your threat model requires per-user key derivation or if your decryption clients can't maintain reliable network connectivity to a single Tang server; network presence is a weaker signal than possession for most cloud-native architectures.
