CIFv3 vs Lunar: 2026 Comparison
CIFv3 is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running threat intelligence pipelines on Linux infrastructure will get the most from CIFv3 if they already understand indicator enrichment and feed aggregation; it costs nothing and integrates well with existing SIEM workflows. The 229 GitHub stars reflect a small but committed user base, not mainstream adoption. Skip this if your team needs a polished UI, vendor support, or out-of-the-box feeds; CIFv3 demands engineering lift and institutional knowledge to operationalize.
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
