chkrootkit vs Rootkit Hunter: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
chkrootkit is a free endpoint detection and response tool. Rootkit Hunter is a free endpoint detection and response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best endpoint detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Linux administrators managing legacy or air-gapped systems need chkrootkit because it runs entirely offline and requires no agent installation, making it the only viable rootkit detection option when your infrastructure can't phone home. The tool performs over 100 signature-based checks for known rootkit artifacts and kernel-level compromises, catching what file integrity monitoring alone will miss. Skip this if you're running modern EDR across your fleet; chkrootkit prioritizes detection over response and won't integrate with your SOC workflows, making it a one-off forensic tool rather than a continuous monitoring layer.
Unix administrators managing legacy systems or air-gapped environments need Rootkit Hunter for its signature-based rootkit detection without requiring agent infrastructure or cloud connectivity. The tool runs entirely offline and catches kernel-level compromises that network-based detection misses, making it valuable for NIST Identify and Detect functions in stripped-down environments. Skip this if you're running modern Linux distributions with SELinux and need real-time behavioral monitoring; Rootkit Hunter is scan-based and reactive, not preventive, and won't replace EDR for active threat hunting or rapid response.
