Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Cato Networks ZTNA is a commercial zero trust network access tool by Cato Networks. Healthroam is a commercial zero trust network access tool by HealthRoam. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best zero trust network access fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing legacy VPN with zero trust will prefer Cato Networks ZTNA for its cloud-native architecture that eliminates the need to manage on-premises infrastructure while enforcing identity-based access across hybrid IT. The platform covers both NIST PR.AA (identity and access control) and PR.IR (infrastructure resilience), meaning you get access policy enforcement without sacrificing visibility into whether your security perimeter actually holds under load. Skip this if your organization runs primarily on-premises and needs deep microsegmentation of internal networks; Cato shines at securing remote access to distributed resources, not re-architecting the datacenter.
NHS trusts and integrated care boards managing remote clinical access across multiple organizations should choose Healthroam to eliminate VPN token management without sacrificing passwordless security. The tool holds Cyber Essentials Plus certification and integrates directly with NHSMail, removing the friction that typically derails adoption in federated NHS environments. Skip this if you need centralized device posture enforcement or threat response automation; Healthroam prioritizes frictionless authentication over detection capabilities, making it strongest for access control rather than incident response workflows.
Cloud-based ZTNA solution for secure remote access to applications
Secure remote access service for NHS staff without VPN tokens or passwords
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Cato Networks ZTNA vs Healthroam for your zero trust network access needs.
Cato Networks ZTNA: Cloud-based ZTNA solution for secure remote access to applications. built by Cato Networks. Core capabilities include Identity verification and multi-factor authentication, Policy-based access control using user identity, location, and device posture, Network microsegmentation with software-defined security perimeters..
Healthroam: Secure remote access service for NHS staff without VPN tokens or passwords. built by HealthRoam. Core capabilities include Passwordless authentication, Built-in secure VPN, NHSMail integration..
Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Cato Networks ZTNA differentiates with Identity verification and multi-factor authentication, Policy-based access control using user identity, location, and device posture, Network microsegmentation with software-defined security perimeters. Healthroam differentiates with Passwordless authentication, Built-in secure VPN, NHSMail integration.
Cato Networks ZTNA is developed by Cato Networks. Healthroam is developed by HealthRoam. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Cato Networks ZTNA and Healthroam serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both are Zero Trust Network Access tools, both cover ZTNA, Remote Access. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox