Burp-LFI-tests vs xxeserv: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Burp-LFI-tests is a free penetration testing tool. xxeserv is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers who need to systematically test for Local File Inclusion flaws will find Burp-LFI-tests valuable because it consolidates proven LFI payloads and exploitation chains into a Burp extension, cutting manual payload crafting time during assessments. The tool is free and maintained on GitHub with solid community engagement, removing cost friction from your toolkit. This is not a replacement for manual testing or general vulnerability scanning; it's narrowly built for LFI-focused work, so teams expecting broad web vulnerability coverage or automated exploitation should look elsewhere.
Penetration testers validating XXE vulnerabilities during application assessments need xxeserv because it eliminates the friction of spinning up a full exfiltration server; the built-in FTP support handles both standard XXE payloads and file protocol variations without extra infrastructure. At 331 GitHub stars with zero dependencies, it's lightweight enough to run from a laptop during live testing. Skip this if your team needs a Swiss Army knife for multiple payload types; xxeserv is deliberately narrow, designed for XXE-specific work, not broader web exploitation frameworks.
