BloodHound vs Habu Hacking Toolkit: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
BloodHound is a free penetration testing tool. Habu Hacking Toolkit is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers need BloodHound to map Active Directory attack paths that manual testing misses; the graph visualization finds transitive trust relationships and permission chains that would take weeks to discover by hand. The tool is free and has 10,325 GitHub stars, meaning you're inheriting battle-tested logic from thousands of real assessments. Skip BloodHound if your team lacks AD expertise to interpret the output or if you need automated exploitation; it's a discovery and visualization engine, not a post-exploitation framework.
Security teams building internal red team capacity on a budget should reach for Habu Hacking Toolkit; it gives you Python-native attack primitives that integrate cleanly into custom exploitation workflows without licensing friction. The 973 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal a tool mature enough for repeatable penetration testing scenarios. Skip this if your team needs a GUI-driven platform or commercial support; Habu demands Python fluency and rewards operators who read code, not buttons.
