BloodHound vs getallurls (gau): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
BloodHound is a free penetration testing tool. getallurls (gau) is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers need BloodHound to map Active Directory attack paths that manual testing misses; the graph visualization finds transitive trust relationships and permission chains that would take weeks to discover by hand. The tool is free and has 10,325 GitHub stars, meaning you're inheriting battle-tested logic from thousands of real assessments. Skip BloodHound if your team lacks AD expertise to interpret the output or if you need automated exploitation; it's a discovery and visualization engine, not a post-exploitation framework.
Penetration testers and bug bounty hunters doing reconnaissance will move faster with getallurls than manually querying individual URL sources; it aggregates results from CommonCrawl, URLScan, and Wayback Machine in a single pass. The tool has 4,549 GitHub stars and runs for free, making it a no-friction addition to any recon workflow. Skip this if you need real-time monitoring or filtered results; getallurls surfaces historical URLs without deduplication or relevance ranking, leaving you to sort signal from noise.
