Blindagem de Sites vs Somansa Webkeeper: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Blindagem de Sites

Startups and SMBs protecting customer-facing applications on tight budgets should consider Blindagem de Sites for its bundled WAF, CDN, and vulnerability scanning in a single cloud platform, eliminating the need to stitch together separate point tools. The vendor's PCI-DSS ASV certification and real-time DDoS protection cover the compliance and availability demands most early-stage companies face. Skip this if you need sophisticated API security or behavioral threat detection beyond signature-based WAF rules; the small 15-person team means feature velocity is slower than larger competitors, and detection capabilities lag on NIST Continuous Monitoring compared to intent-driven SIEM integrations.

Somansa Webkeeper

Mid-market and enterprise teams struggling to monitor encrypted traffic and control generative AI use will find Somansa Webkeeper's SSL/TLS decryption and ChatGPT blocking worth the on-premises footprint. The 10-million-site database refreshing every 30 minutes and 100% access logging directly address NIST DE.CM continuous monitoring requirements that most web filters only partially satisfy. Skip this if you need cloud-native deployment or a consolidated DLP platform; Webkeeper is narrowly built for organizations that can justify dedicated hardware for encrypted traffic inspection.