What is the difference between Blaze DDoS Protection vs Gatekeeper?

**Blaze DDoS Protection**: DDoS mitigation service using traffic scrubbing centers and global backbone. built by Blaze Networks Limited. Core capabilities include Automated DDoS attack detection and mitigation, Traffic scrubbing through global scrubbing centers, BGP Flow spec deployment for volumetric attack mitigation.. **Gatekeeper**: An open source DDoS protection system that uses distributed algorithms to defend against multi-vector attacks and scale to handle varying bandwidth requirements for network operators and service providers.. Both serve the Distributed Denial of Service Mitigation market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Who makes Blaze DDoS Protection vs Gatekeeper?

**Blaze DDoS Protection** is developed by Blaze Networks Limited. **Gatekeeper** is open-source with 1,591 GitHub stars. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Blaze DDoS Protection a good alternative to Gatekeeper?

Blaze DDoS Protection and Gatekeeper serve similar Distributed Denial of Service Mitigation use cases: both are Distributed Denial of Service Mitigation tools, both cover DDOS, Network Monitoring, Traffic Filtering. Key differences: Blaze DDoS Protection is Commercial while Gatekeeper is Free, Gatekeeper is open-source. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Blaze DDoS Protection vs Gatekeeper: Features, Integrations, Reviews (2026) | CybersecTools

Blaze DDoS Protection vs Gatekeeper: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.

Blaze DDoS Protection is a commercial distributed denial of service mitigation tool by Blaze Networks Limited. Gatekeeper is a free distributed denial of service mitigation tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best distributed denial of service mitigation fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:

Blaze DDoS Protection

Mid-market and enterprise teams facing volumetric DDoS attacks need Blaze DDoS Protection for its 80+ Tbps ingestion capacity and sub-millisecond scrubbing latency across 17 global centers, which means attacks don't tank user experience while mitigation runs. The 114 billion daily NetFlow records feed continuous Layer 3 and Layer 4 attack detection without manual tuning, and its command and control takedown capability addresses the operational overhead most teams underestimate. Skip this if your threat model is primarily application-layer attacks; Blaze's strength is volumetric and protocol-based assault, not WAF work.

Gatekeeper

Network operators and service providers facing multi-vector DDoS attacks will find Gatekeeper's distributed algorithm approach valuable because it actually scales with your bandwidth requirements instead of hitting throughput walls like centralized scrubbing centers do. The open source model with 1,591 GitHub stars means you're not locked into vendor infrastructure, and deployment across your own edge nodes gives you detection latency measured in milliseconds rather than the round-trip delays of cloud mitigation services. Skip this if your primary concern is stopping Layer 7 application attacks; Gatekeeper prioritizes network-layer volumetric defense, leaving sophisticated HTTP floods to separate WAF tooling.