Bifrozt vs Manuka by Andew Michael Smith: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Bifrozt is a free honeypots & deception tool. Manuka by Andew Michael Smith is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Linux security teams with limited budgets who want to catch attackers post-breach will find value in Bifrozt's high-interaction honeypot approach, which logs attacker behavior and system modifications in detail rather than just flagging presence. The free pricing removes cost as a barrier for small teams or proof-of-concept deployments, and the data integrity features mean you can actually trust what the honeypot captured as evidence. Skip this if you need deception across Windows, cloud infrastructure, or network segments; Bifrozt's Linux-only scope is a hard boundary.
Security teams building internal honeypot infrastructure on limited budgets will appreciate Manuka by Andew Michael Smith for how quickly it spins up dionaea and kippo instances without wrestling Docker configuration. The script approach cuts setup time from hours to minutes, which matters when you're running honeypots as a learning tool or low-cost early warning system. Skip this if you need managed honeypot infrastructure, commercial-grade alert tuning, or support beyond what the 26-star GitHub community provides; Manuka assumes you're comfortable maintaining your own Docker environment and interpreting raw honeypot data.
