Bifrozt vs Glutton Setup: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Bifrozt is a free honeypots & deception tool. Glutton Setup is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Linux security teams with limited budgets who want to catch attackers post-breach will find value in Bifrozt's high-interaction honeypot approach, which logs attacker behavior and system modifications in detail rather than just flagging presence. The free pricing removes cost as a barrier for small teams or proof-of-concept deployments, and the data integrity features mean you can actually trust what the honeypot captured as evidence. Skip this if you need deception across Windows, cloud infrastructure, or network segments; Bifrozt's Linux-only scope is a hard boundary.
Security teams running exposed SSH infrastructure who need fast, low-friction honeypot deployment will get real value from Glutton Setup. It eliminates weeks of manual instrumentation; the 286 GitHub stars reflect active community validation of the setup process itself, not vaporware. Skip this if you need centralized deception across multiple protocols or enterprise-scale alerting; Glutton is SSH-specific and demands you own the monitoring stack downstream.
