BGP Ranking vs Lunar: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
BGP Ranking is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Network security teams responsible for ISP vetting and upstream threat visibility should use BGP Ranking to identify which carriers are actively harboring malicious infrastructure; it's free and openly maintained, which means you're not betting on vendor support for what amounts to shared threat intelligence. The tool ranks roughly 65,000 ASNs by malicious activity levels, giving you concrete data to push back on "we have to use this carrier" conversations. Skip this if your threat model starts and ends with endpoint or application security; BGP Ranking is upstream infrastructure intelligence, not a replacement for network detection tools.
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
