Beyond Encryption Mailock for Outlook vs Beyond Encryption Mailock® Secure Email: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Beyond Encryption Mailock for Outlook

SMB and mid-market teams that need to stop encrypted emails from being forwarded or screenshotted after delivery should use Beyond Encryption Mailock for Outlook, since message revocation works even after recipients have opened attachments. The tool covers NIST PR.DS and PR.AA through AES-256 encryption and multi-factor recipient authentication, eliminating the "trust the recipient" problem that plagues standard TLS. Skip this if your org requires integration with Gmail or non-Microsoft clients; Mailock is Outlook-only and leaves users on other platforms without encryption protections.

Beyond Encryption Mailock® Secure Email

Teams handling regulated data who need proof that sensitive emails were opened, not just sent, should consider Beyond Encryption Mailock® Secure Email; message tracking and revocation give you the audit trail that generic TLS encryption cannot. AES-256 encryption with multi-factor recipient verification covers the NIST PR.DS and PR.AA controls auditors actually ask for. Skip this if your priority is preventing internal data exfiltration rather than securing external communication; Mailock assumes the recipient's inbox is the trust boundary, not an extension of your network.