BBT.live BeTNA vs Seqrite ZTNA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

BBT.live BeTNA: ZTNA solution providing identity-based, continuous-verification network access control. built by BBT.live (BeBroadband). Core capabilities include Continuous user and device authentication and authorization, Dynamic access policies adjustable based on user behavior, Micro-segmentation to limit attack surface and lateral movement..

Seqrite ZTNA: Cloud-based ZTNA solution for secure app access without VPNs. built by Seqrite. Core capabilities include Agent-based and agentless connectivity, Application-centric access control for web apps, RDP, SSH, VNC, SAP, and VoIP, Real-time device posture checks and user-device binding..

Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

BBT.live BeTNA differentiates with Continuous user and device authentication and authorization, Dynamic access policies adjustable based on user behavior, Micro-segmentation to limit attack surface and lateral movement. Seqrite ZTNA differentiates with Agent-based and agentless connectivity, Application-centric access control for web apps, RDP, SSH, VNC, SAP, and VoIP, Real-time device posture checks and user-device binding.

BBT.live BeTNA is developed by BBT.live (BeBroadband). Seqrite ZTNA is developed by Seqrite. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

BBT.live BeTNA integrates with SD-WAN, SASE. Seqrite ZTNA integrates with Identity Providers (IdP). Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.

BBT.live BeTNA and Seqrite ZTNA serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both are Zero Trust Network Access tools, both cover ZTNA. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.