Bastille-Linux vs CAI (Cybersecurity AI): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Bastille-Linux is a free offensive security tool. CAI (Cybersecurity AI) is a free offensive security tool by Alias Robotics. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Linux administrators managing compliance-sensitive infrastructure on thin budgets should deploy Bastille-Linux for its ability to systematically lock down systems and document every hardening decision for auditors. The tool automates configuration of NIST CSF Govern and Protect controls across kernel parameters, file permissions, and service exposure, reducing manual configuration drift. Skip it if your team lacks Linux expertise or expects a GUI; Bastille requires hands-on knowledge to interpret its recommendations and integrate outputs into your change management workflow.
Security teams at startups and small consulting firms who need LLM-powered penetration testing without licensing friction should build on CAI; the framework's 500+ supported LLMs and 15+ agents let you run offensive automation in your own environment at zero cost. The GitHub community (3,641 stars) and on-premises deployment mean you control the entire supply chain, which matters when handling client data during assessments. Skip this if your organization lacks Python engineers to customize agents or needs vendor-backed SLAs; CAI prioritizes offensive capability over the detection and response coverage that enterprise security teams typically require.
