Autorize vs Synack Sara: 2026 Comparison
Autorize is a free penetration testing tool. Synack Sara is a commercial penetration testing tool by Synack. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers running Burp Suite will get immediate value from Autorize for catching authorization bypass vulnerabilities that manual testing misses. The extension automates the tedious work of comparing access control across roles and endpoints, reducing false negatives in a phase where human attention drifts. With 1,101 GitHub stars and active maintenance, it's proven reliable in real assessments. Skip this if your team relies on dynamic application security testing platforms with built-in authorization scanning; Autorize is a Burp-specific tactical tool, not a replacement for DAST with native access control modules.
Security teams drowning in scan results will cut through the noise fastest with Synack Sara, which filters exploitable vulnerabilities from false positives through autonomous pentest logic rather than forcing analysts to triage manually. A 2-3 day time-to-value with AI testing in hours and human validation in days beats the standard 6-8 week pentest cycle, and the 75% cost reduction per engagement is real when you're running quarterly assessments across mid-market or enterprise infrastructure. Skip this if you need continuous runtime detection or prioritize speed over validation; Sara's strength is confidence in findings, not coverage velocity, and that human handoff means you're still waiting days for the final report.
