Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
authentik is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by authentik. Mi-Token is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by Mi-Token. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best multi-factor authentication and single sign-on fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need SSO and MFA without vendor lock-in should run authentik; the open-source model means you own the codebase, avoid licensing creep as you scale, and can self-host or go hybrid without renegotiating contracts. It covers NIST PR.AA identity management and access control natively, and the built-in application proxy handles remote access to RDP, SSH, and VNC without bolting on a separate tool. Expect to staff more ops lift than a SaaS alternative; this is not the tool for teams wanting a hands-off managed identity service.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing hybrid on-premises infrastructure with heavy Windows AD dependency will get the most from Mi-Token; its native Credential Provider support for Windows login and ADFS integration eliminates the friction of bolted-on MFA that breaks user workflows. The token independence supporting any OATH-compliant hardware token means you're not locked into a single vendor's devices, and NIST CSF 2.0 coverage of identity management and authentication reflects solid foundational design. Skip Mi-Token if your organization is cloud-first or needs cloud-native SSO; the on-premises architecture and legacy-heavy feature set make it a poor fit for teams migrating away from Active Directory.
Open-source identity provider with SSO, MFA, and application proxy capabilities
MFA & SSO solution with hard/soft token support and AD integration.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing authentik vs Mi-Token for your multi-factor authentication and single sign-on needs.
authentik: Open-source identity provider with SSO, MFA, and application proxy capabilities. built by authentik. Core capabilities include Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on with OAuth2/OIDC and SAML2 support, Application proxy..
Mi-Token: MFA & SSO solution with hard/soft token support and AD integration. built by Mi-Token. Core capabilities include Multi-factor authentication (MFA) via hard and soft tokens, Soft tokens for iOS, Android, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, and SMS, Token independence supporting any OATH-compliant hard token..
Both serve the Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
authentik differentiates with Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on with OAuth2/OIDC and SAML2 support, Application proxy. Mi-Token differentiates with Multi-factor authentication (MFA) via hard and soft tokens, Soft tokens for iOS, Android, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, and SMS, Token independence supporting any OATH-compliant hard token.
authentik is developed by authentik. Mi-Token is developed by Mi-Token. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
authentik and Mi-Token serve similar Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On use cases: both are Multi-Factor Authentication and Single Sign-On tools, both cover MFA, Authentication, Active Directory. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox