Authen2cate vs UserLock: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Authen2cate is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by Authen2cate. UserLock is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by IS Decisions. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best multi-factor authentication and single sign-on fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Startups and early-stage SMBs needing to lock down employee access without overcomplicating identity infrastructure should evaluate Authen2cate, particularly if they're already running Active Directory on premises. The platform delivers SSO and MFA in one product, which eliminates the tax of bolting separate tools together, and its hybrid deployment model means you don't have to rip out existing directory infrastructure. Skip this if you need SCIM provisioning, fine-grained access policies, or plans to scale past a few dozen users; the pricing and feature set clearly target the sub-100-person window.
SMB and mid-market teams managing on-premises or hybrid Active Directory environments need UserLock for context-aware access control that blocks compromised credentials even after MFA bypass. The tool maps directly to NIST PR.AA by enforcing device posture and location checks before granting logon, not just at initial authentication. Skip this if your infrastructure is cloud-native or you lack Active Directory as a core identity system; UserLock's value collapses without AD to anchor on.
