Atakama Multifactor Encryption vs eperi sEcure: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Mid-market and enterprise teams shipping sensitive files to partners or cloud storage need Atakama Multifactor Encryption to stop exfiltration at the file level, not the network edge. The multifactor decryption requirement means stolen credentials alone won't unlock data, and the hybrid deployment model lets you protect files in motion without ripping out your existing infrastructure. Skip this if your threat model assumes users won't intentionally move files out of your control; Atakama assumes they will, and builds accordingly. SMB and mid-market teams handling sensitive data across Microsoft 365 or Salesforce will find real value in eperi sEcure because it encrypts at the client before data ever touches the cloud, keeping encryption keys fully in your control rather than your vendor's. The GDPR, DORA, and NIS-2 compliance mappings are built in, and function-preserving encryption means your teams keep using these apps normally after deployment. Skip this if you need post-deployment searchability across encrypted data at scale, or if you're running heavy workloads across dozens of SaaS platforms beyond the tight Microsoft/Salesforce integration set.