Atakama Browser Security Platform vs Ping Browser: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Atakama Browser Security Platform

MSPs managing browsers across dozens of customer environments will find real value in Atakama Browser Security Platform's multi-tenant architecture and RMM integration, which means policy enforcement and threat response happen without pulling clients out of their existing tools. The platform covers the full NIST Identify and Protect functions, from asset discovery through data exfiltration prevention, and its DNS filtering plus DLP features address the gap most browsers leave open when users bypass authentication or copy sensitive data to personal accounts. Skip this if you need endpoint detection and response beyond the browser layer; Atakama is purpose-built for web threats and user behavior, not lateral movement or post-compromise investigation.

Ping Browser

Mid-market and enterprise security teams replacing VDI deployments will get the most from Ping Browser because it strips out infrastructure overhead while maintaining device-agnostic access control for SaaS applications. The Chromium foundation delivers NIST PR.AA compliance around identity and access limits without requiring per-device hardening, and cloud deployment means no on-premises browser server management. Skip this if your threat model demands endpoint Detection and Response or assumes compromised client machines need behavioral monitoring; Ping Browser prioritizes access control and data isolation over continuous anomaly detection on the user's device.