Atakama Browser Security Platform vs LayerX Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Atakama Browser Security Platform

MSPs managing browsers across dozens of customer environments will find real value in Atakama Browser Security Platform's multi-tenant architecture and RMM integration, which means policy enforcement and threat response happen without pulling clients out of their existing tools. The platform covers the full NIST Identify and Protect functions, from asset discovery through data exfiltration prevention, and its DNS filtering plus DLP features address the gap most browsers leave open when users bypass authentication or copy sensitive data to personal accounts. Skip this if you need endpoint detection and response beyond the browser layer; Atakama is purpose-built for web threats and user behavior, not lateral movement or post-compromise investigation.

LayerX Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in Shadow SaaS and generative AI usage need LayerX Platform because it actually stops data exfiltration at the browser before it happens, not after logs show it did. The platform covers five NIST CSF 2.0 functions including continuous monitoring and data security, with anti-tampering protection that prevents users from simply disabling the extension when they get annoyed. Skip this if your organization lacks the endpoint management maturity to enforce browser extensions company-wide or if you need visibility into non-web applications; LayerX owns the browser layer and doesn't pretend otherwise.