Aserto vs Repokid: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aserto is a commercial identity governance and administration tool by Aserto. Repokid is a free identity governance and administration tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best identity governance and administration fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams managing fine-grained access across microservices and APIs should pick Aserto for its 1ms authorization latency, which makes it viable for real-time decision-making without degrading application performance. The tool's support for relationship-based access control (ReBAC) via a Zanzibar-inspired directory gives you the modeling flexibility that RBAC and ABAC alone cannot provide for complex permission hierarchies. Skip this if your organization is early-stage and still consolidating identity providers; Aserto assumes mature directory integrations and demands policy-as-code discipline that smaller teams may not yet need.
AWS teams already drowning in IAM permission creep should use Repokid because it's the only free tool that actually removes unused permissions instead of just flagging them. It ties directly to AWS Access Advisor data, so the removals stick without breaking running services, and the 1,142 GitHub stars reflect genuine adoption by teams managing hundreds of roles. Skip it if your organization needs centralized governance across multiple cloud providers or wants audit workflows baked in; Repokid is a surgical tool for AWS-only shops that have the engineering capacity to integrate and validate removal decisions.
