Aryon Security vs Group-IB Cloud Security Posture Management: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Aryon Security

Security teams managing multiple cloud platforms without deep infrastructure expertise should pick Aryon Security for its AI-generated policies that adapt to your actual environment rather than forcing generic baselines. The tool covers CIS Cloud, NIST, PCI-DSS, and HIPAA frameworks across AWS, Azure, and GCP without requiring cloud-native policy knowledge, and its pre-deployment impact assessment prevents the enforcement failures that plague most CSPM rollouts. Skip this if you're looking for runtime threat detection or need deep investigation capabilities; Aryon stops misconfigurations before they become incidents, but doesn't hunt lateral movement or respond to active breaches.

Group-IB Cloud Security Posture Management

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing multicloud infrastructure across AWS, Azure, and GCP will find real value in Group-IB Cloud Security Posture Management's tight integration with threat intelligence and attack surface context, which elevates risk prioritization beyond generic misconfiguration flagging. The agentless API scanning covers CIS 8.1 and NIST 800-53 compliance, and the built-in CI/CD checks for CodeBuild and CodeDeploy catch drift earlier in the pipeline. Skip this if your primary need is remediation automation or deep CIEM capabilities; Group-IB prioritizes visibility and threat correlation over orchestrated fixes.