Armour Mobile vs LockUp: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Armour Mobile is a commercial mobile data protection tool by Armour Communications. LockUp is a free mobile data protection tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best mobile data protection fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Enterprise and mid-market defence contractors need Armour Mobile specifically for classified comms that satisfy NATO and UK government approval without custom integration hell. NATO Restricted and OFFICIAL SENSITIVE clearance baked in, plus FOI-compliant audit trails and device revocation, means you skip the certification delays that kill typical commercial platforms in this space. NIST Identity Management and Data Security coverage is solid, though the feature set tilts heavily toward secure transport rather than zero-trust device posture; if your threat model centres on endpoint compromise before the encrypted channel, you'll need layered defences elsewhere. Wrong choice for non-defence organizations or anyone without classification requirements.
Activists, journalists, and at-risk individuals in high-surveillance regions need LockUp because it's one of the few tools that actually degrades forensic imaging on Android devices instead of just encrypting files. The 344 GitHub stars reflect a real community validating the approach against Cellebrite UFED and similar extraction tools used by state actors. This is not for organizations; LockUp is purpose-built for individuals facing targeted threat models where law enforcement or hostile governments may seize their phone, and it requires technical sophistication to deploy correctly.
