Armis Secure Remote Access vs Claroty xDome Secure Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Armis Secure Remote Access

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing access to industrial devices and PLCs will get the most from Armis Secure Remote Access because it actually understands OT protocols instead of treating them as afterthoughts. The tool supports PROFINET and Modbus natively alongside standard RDP and SSH, eliminating the dangerous practice of opening multiple firewall ports to legacy equipment. Its strength in PR.AA (identity and access control) means access decisions are tied to who you are, not just what network you're on, which matters when your users are scattered across sites and your OT environment can't tolerate failed authentication loops. Skip this if you're running a purely IT-focused remote access program or need tight integration with your existing privileged access management stack; Armis is purpose-built for OT complexity, not IT simplicity.

Claroty xDome Secure Access

Enterprise and mid-market teams managing industrial control systems or healthcare devices will get the most from Claroty xDome Secure Access because it treats CPS asset discovery and exposure mapping as a prerequisite to access control, not an afterthought. The platform covers ID.AM and PR.AA across NIST CSF 2.0, meaning you get genuine asset inventory before you lock down who touches what, and the hybrid deployment model handles both air-gapped and connected environments without requiring full network redesigns. Skip this if your priority is detection speed over access prevention; xDome's strength is keeping unauthorized users off the network entirely, not catching them after they're in.