Arc4dia Counter-APT Training vs GRFICS: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Arc4dia Counter-APT Training is a commercial cyber range training tool by Arc4dia. GRFICS is a free cyber range training tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cyber range training fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams with staff who hunt APT indicators or respond to advanced threats should choose Arc4dia Counter-APT Training for its instructor-led model built around tradecraft from practitioners with operational cyber intelligence experience, not theoretical frameworks. The multi-level curriculum runs from foundational reverse engineering and web security through force-on-force engagement scenarios, addressing the full NIST Awareness and Training function. Skip this if your team needs remote, self-paced training or lacks the operational maturity to absorb scenario-based instruction; the value comes from experienced instructors, not polish.
Security teams training ICS defenders on a budget should use GRFICS because it's free and lets operators practice real attack chains in a visual 3D environment instead of reading documentation or staring at command lines. The framework runs on Unity and requires no licensing, making it practical for manufacturing facilities and utilities that can't justify expensive simulators for tabletop exercises. Skip this if your team needs NIST Govern function support or compliance reporting; GRFICS is pure hands-on practice, not an audit tool.
