APT Groups and Operations vs Lunar: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
APT Groups and Operations is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Threat intelligence teams doing adversary tracking and incident response will find APT Groups and Operations indispensable for resolving naming conflicts across vendors; security firms and government agencies spend real time mapping which Chinese APT is which, and this tool eliminates that friction. The database tracks over 700 distinct group identifiers and aliases, covering the same threat actors under five different names depending on which vendor named them first. Skip this if you need operational indicators or attack chain details; this is reference material for alignment, not a replacement for feeds that tell you what these groups are actually doing right now.
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
