Apomatix vs ON2IT Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Apomatix

Mid-market and SMB risk and compliance teams drowning in spreadsheets will find real value in Apomatix's asset-to-control linkage and automated treatment guidance, which cuts the manual busywork that kills GRC programs. The platform covers NIST CSF 2.0's full risk management chain from GV.RM strategy through ID.RA assessment and ID.AM asset tracking, with built-in ISO 27001 and CIS 20 control testing that actually enforces rigor rather than just logging checkboxes. Skip this if you need deep third-party risk orchestration or if your organization is large enough to justify purpose-built tools for governance, risk, and audit as separate functions; Apomatix consolidates well for lean teams but doesn't scale into enterprise separation-of-duties complexity.

ON2IT Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ)

Mid-market and enterprise security leaders who need to justify cybersecurity spend to boards and insurers should start with ON2IT Cyber Risk Quantification because it converts vulnerability data into dollar figures that CFOs and audit committees actually understand. The tool maps your protect surface, rates control maturity across IT, OT, and cloud environments, and generates SEC and DORA-compliant evidence packs automatically, with 24x7 SOC monitoring baked in. Skip this if your organization has already solved the business case problem or if you're still in the early stages of asset visibility; CRQ assumes you've got baseline hygiene and need to communicate residual risk upward, not build foundational controls from scratch.