Apomatix vs asvin Risk by Context: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Apomatix: Risk management platform for risk registers, asset & control mgmt. built by Apomatix. Core capabilities include Risk identification, analysis, evaluation, and treatment workflows, Risk register with ownership assignment and maturity tracking, Automated risk treatment guidance..

asvin Risk by Context: AI-driven cyber risk prioritization platform for IT/OT environments. built by asvin. Core capabilities include AI-powered Risk by Context (RBC) Index generation combining cybersecurity metrics, network, asset, and business data, Graph-based visualization of asset relationships, vulnerabilities, threats, and business impact, Topological mapping of digital infrastructure and dependencies..

Both serve the Risk Assessment market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Apomatix differentiates with Risk identification, analysis, evaluation, and treatment workflows, Risk register with ownership assignment and maturity tracking, Automated risk treatment guidance. asvin Risk by Context differentiates with AI-powered Risk by Context (RBC) Index generation combining cybersecurity metrics, network, asset, and business data, Graph-based visualization of asset relationships, vulnerabilities, threats, and business impact, Topological mapping of digital infrastructure and dependencies.

Apomatix is developed by Apomatix. asvin Risk by Context is developed by asvin. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Apomatix and asvin Risk by Context serve similar Risk Assessment use cases: both are Risk Assessment tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.