Antiy PTA-mobile vs capa: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy PTA-mobile is a commercial malware analysis tool by Antiy Labs. capa is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams handling high-volume Android app intake will benefit most from Antiy PTA-mobile's ability to monitor 200+ dynamic behaviors across 26 categories in a single sandbox run, capturing network traffic, file artifacts, and UI state without manual case work. The hybrid deployment model supports both server-based processing for large app batches and portable device carriers for field analysis, making it practical for carriers and regional security ops. Skip this if your organization needs upstream static analysis as a primary control; Antiy's strength is post-deployment behavioral visibility, not catching issues before apps ship.
Malware analysts and incident responders who need fast capability extraction from suspect binaries should reach for capa; it maps executable behaviors directly to ATT&CK techniques without requiring sandbox execution, cutting analysis time when you're triaging thousands of samples. The tool supports PE, ELF, and .NET formats plus shellcode analysis, and its 5,887 GitHub stars reflect active community validation in real incident work. Skip capa if your team needs automated triage at scale or integration with your existing EDR alerts; this is a manual analysis workbench, not a detection layer.
