angr vs Luyten: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
angr is a free offensive security tool. Luyten is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security researchers and red teamers who need to reverse-engineer unfamiliar binaries without source code will find angr indispensable; its symbolic execution engine can explore execution paths automatically and uncover vulnerabilities that static analysis alone misses. The 8,549 GitHub stars reflect active maintenance and a researcher community that continuously extends the framework with plugins for new architectures and analysis techniques. Skip angr if your team lacks Python proficiency or needs a GUI; this is a command-line tool for practitioners comfortable writing analysis scripts, not a point-and-click reverse engineering platform.
Penetration testers and red teamers who spend hours manually analyzing obfuscated Java bytecode will cut that time in half with Luyten's GUI-driven decompilation. The tool sits atop Procyon, a decompiler known for handling modern Java constructs that older tools like JD-GUI struggle with, and its 5,120 GitHub stars reflect sustained adoption among practitioners. Skip this if you need automated vulnerability scanning or integration with your existing pentest workflow; Luyten is a standalone decompiler for interactive reverse engineering, not a platform play.
