ANGOKA Machine Identity Management vs ITrust Signature Brick: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

ANGOKA Machine Identity Management

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing sprawling IoT, embedded, and edge device fleets will get the most from ANGOKA Machine Identity Management because it anchors identities to hardware rather than relying on software-only certificates that attackers routinely compromise. The agent-based architecture supports hybrid environments without forcing rip-and-replace, and the distributed ledger approach for compliance metadata cuts the busywork of manual identity audits significantly. Skip this if your estate is purely cloud-native SaaS with no physical devices; the hardware root of trust overhead is wasted here.

ITrust Signature Brick

SMBs and mid-market firms that need to embed legally binding electronic signatures into existing workflows without replacing their document infrastructure should evaluate ITrust Signature Brick. Its hybrid deployment model and API-first design mean you're not ripping out your current PDF tooling; the signature layer bolts on top, which cuts implementation time and training overhead. Skip this if you need a full document management platform or expect vendor-managed compliance reporting; Signature Brick handles signing ceremonies, not record retention or audit trails at the level Enterprise legal teams typically demand.