Is AndroFuzz a good alternative to Android port of Radamsa?

AndroFuzz and Android port of Radamsa serve similar Offensive Security use cases: both are Offensive Security tools, both cover Fuzzing. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

AndroFuzz vs Android port of Radamsa: 2026 Comparison Guide | CybersecTools

AndroFuzz vs Android port of Radamsa: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Q: What is the difference between AndroFuzz vs Android port of Radamsa?

**AndroFuzz**: A simple file format fuzzer for Android that can fuzz multiple readers at once.. **Android port of Radamsa**: An Android port of the Radamsa fuzzing tool compiled with Android NDK to support Android ABIs for security testing on mobile platforms.. Both serve the Offensive Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.

AndroFuzz is a free offensive security tool. Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:

Android port of Radamsa

Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.

Data verified May 2026