Anchore Secure vs Falco: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Anchore Secure is a commercial container security tool by Anchore. Falco is a free container security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best container security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams with strict vulnerability governance will get the most from Anchore Secure, specifically its ability to track historical vulnerability exposure without forcing rescans of every image each time a new CVE drops. The SBOM generation through Syft and policy-based compliance checks directly address NIST ID.RA risk assessment requirements. Skip this if your team needs runtime threat detection; Anchore is a scanning and inventory tool, not a behavioral enforcement platform.
DevOps and platform engineering teams managing Kubernetes clusters on a budget will get the most from Falco; its syscall-level kernel monitoring catches runtime anomalies that signature-based tools miss, and the CNCF graduation status means you're adopting what mature teams already run at scale. The free pricing removes procurement friction for teams piloting runtime security or standardizing across multiple clusters. Skip Falco if you need out-of-the-box response automation or a managed SaaS; tuning detection rules and operationalizing alerts requires engineering bandwidth that smaller security teams often don't have.
