AMT Honeypot vs Log4Pot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
AMT Honeypot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Log4Pot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams defending legacy Intel systems or managing air-gapped environments with minimal patching velocity will find AMT Honeypot valuable for its surgical focus on CVE-2017-5689 exploitation attempts, the vulnerability that remains actively scanned across enterprise networks six years after disclosure. The tool's Go-based simplicity means it deploys in minutes without the dependency bloat that kills honeypot adoption in resource-constrained labs. Skip this if you need breadth across multiple firmware families or alerting integration; AMT Honeypot logs locally and detects one vulnerability class, period.
Security teams running Java applications who need to confirm Log4Shell exploitation attempts in their environment should deploy Log4Pot; it's free and purpose-built specifically for this vulnerability, so you're not paying for detection breadth you don't need. The 91 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal it's being used in production by practitioners who've already solved the "which honeypot catches Log4j" question. Skip this if you're looking for a general-purpose honeypot framework that covers multiple vulnerability classes or integrates with your SOAR; Log4Pot's narrowness is its strength, not a limitation.
