Akamai MFA vs Intralan No Results Found: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Akamai MFA is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by Akamai. Intralan No Results Found is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by IntraLAN. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best multi-factor authentication and single sign-on fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams replacing SMS-based MFA will see the biggest payoff from Akamai MFA because FIDO2 authentication on smartphones eliminates phishing attacks that kill weaker push systems. The solution handles private key cryptography with zero shared secrets, meaning compromised servers don't expose authentication material, and it integrates directly into Active Directory and Okta without forcing new identity infrastructure. Skip this if your org needs passwordless sign-on as your primary use case; Akamai MFA is authentication-layer focused, not a full replacement for legacy password vaults.
Startups and SMBs needing fast MFA deployment without legacy authentication debt should evaluate Intralan No Results Found, a Cisco Duo implementation that trades customization for speed to market. The cloud-only deployment means zero on-premises infrastructure, and alignment with NIST CSF 2.0's Identity Management function confirms solid foundational access controls. Skip this if your organization requires deep integration with existing identity systems or needs vendor support beyond the 18-person team's capacity to deliver.
