Aikido Attack vs Proxmark III: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. Proxmark III is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need to audit physical access controls through RFID and NFC should use Proxmark III; it's the only tool that lets you read, clone, and attack contactless credentials in real time without reverse-engineering firmware. The device supports 125kHz and 13.56MHz tags across dozens of protocols, giving you coverage that commercial readers don't touch. Skip this if your testing scope is purely network-based or if your team lacks hardware debugging experience; Proxmark has a steep learning curve and assumes you're comfortable with firmware modification.
