Aikido Attack vs MicroBurst: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. MicroBurst is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Azure penetration testers and red teamers need MicroBurst because it's the only free toolkit that maps Azure misconfigurations to actual post-exploitation paths rather than just flagging them. With 2,320 GitHub stars and active community contribution, it gives you discovery, lateral movement, and privilege escalation primitives purpose-built for Azure's identity and resource model. Skip this if your team needs a commercial support contract or expects a GUI; MicroBurst is command-line only and demands PowerShell fluency to operationalize.
