AhnLab EDR vs Zentral: 2026 Comparison
AhnLab EDR is a commercial endpoint detection and response tool by AhnLab. Zentral is a free endpoint detection and response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best endpoint detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams in Asia-Pacific regions will find AhnLab EDR's strength in behavioral attack chain visualization and MITRE ATT&CK mapping, which cuts investigation time when your SOC is lean on analysts. The platform covers the full NIST Detect and Respond workflow, with strong capabilities in continuous monitoring and incident analysis paired with automated containment through process termination and endpoint isolation. Skip this if your environment is heavily cloud-native or you need deep integration with non-AhnLab tooling; the ecosystem is tightly built around AhnLab's own EPP and TIP products, which limits flexibility for heterogeneous stacks.
Teams building detection pipelines on macOS and Linux endpoints will get immediate value from Zentral's event correlation engine; it ingests osquery data at scale and links suspicious activity directly to asset inventory without the overhead of commercial EDR licensing. The GitHub community (806 stars) provides vetted detection rules and the pricing model makes it viable for security-conscious startups and small security shops that can't justify six-figure endpoint tools. Skip this if you need behavioral AI, ransomware prediction, or response automation; Zentral excels at visibility and event linking but assumes your team will write the detection logic and playbooks themselves.
