AhnLab EDR vs DriveLock HYPERSECURE IT: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
AhnLab EDR is a commercial endpoint detection and response tool by AhnLab. DriveLock HYPERSECURE IT is a commercial endpoint detection and response tool by DriveLock SE. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best endpoint detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams in Asia-Pacific regions will find AhnLab EDR's strength in behavioral attack chain visualization and MITRE ATT&CK mapping, which cuts investigation time when your SOC is lean on analysts. The platform covers the full NIST Detect and Respond workflow, with strong capabilities in continuous monitoring and incident analysis paired with automated containment through process termination and endpoint isolation. Skip this if your environment is heavily cloud-native or you need deep integration with non-AhnLab tooling; the ecosystem is tightly built around AhnLab's own EPP and TIP products, which limits flexibility for heterogeneous stacks.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need endpoint detection without the overhead of managing multiple point tools will find DriveLock HYPERSECURE IT worth evaluating, particularly if your organization runs Windows-heavy environments where deployment simplicity matters. The platform's cloud deployment model and dual strength in continuous monitoring (DE.CM) and incident analysis (RS.AN) under NIST CSF 2.0 means you get detection and forensics baked in, not bolted on after the fact. Skip this if you're shopping for the fastest threat response times in class; DriveLock prioritizes breadth of monitoring over speed, which works for steady-state security hygiene but not for shops that live on alert dwell time metrics.
