Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Active Cypher Cypher Cloud is a commercial data loss prevention tool by Active Cypher. SealPath is a commercial data loss prevention tool by SealPath. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best data loss prevention fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Startups and mid-market teams with loose file-sharing habits need Active Cypher Cypher Cloud because it kills the damage from over-shared documents without forcing users into new workflows. The ability to revoke access or recall files after delivery, combined with view-only sharing that blocks downloads and printing, maps directly to NIST PR.DS asset management,your sensitive data stays encrypted and controllable even after it leaves your perimeter. Skip this if your risk profile demands zero-trust architecture across compute; Cypher Cloud solves the file-sharing problem, not network access control.
Mid-market and enterprise teams distributing sensitive files to external parties should start with SealPath because it's one of the few DLP tools that lets you revoke access to documents already in the wild. The hybrid deployment model and native integrations with CAD tools (AutoCAD, SolidWorks, Siemens) mean engineers can encrypt schematics without switching workflows or using proprietary viewers. Skip this if your priority is network-layer DLP or preventing data exfiltration from endpoints; SealPath excels at document-level control and audit, not traffic inspection.
Asset-level file encryption with remote access control across cloud & sharing platforms.
Document-level encryption and access control with native app integration.
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Active Cypher Cypher Cloud vs SealPath for your data loss prevention needs.
Active Cypher Cypher Cloud: Asset-level file encryption with remote access control across cloud & sharing platforms. built by Active Cypher. Core capabilities include Asset-level encryption for new and existing files, View-only file sharing mode preventing download, print, or modification, Remote access revocation at any time post-delivery..
SealPath: Document-level encryption and access control with native app integration. built by SealPath. Core capabilities include Transparent file encryption (open protected files with a double-click, no manual decryption needed), Granular access permissions (read-only, edit, print, extract content) per user, Access tracking and audit logs showing who accessed documents and when..
Both serve the Data Loss Prevention market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Active Cypher Cypher Cloud differentiates with Asset-level encryption for new and existing files, View-only file sharing mode preventing download, print, or modification, Remote access revocation at any time post-delivery. SealPath differentiates with Transparent file encryption (open protected files with a double-click, no manual decryption needed), Granular access permissions (read-only, edit, print, extract content) per user, Access tracking and audit logs showing who accessed documents and when.
Active Cypher Cypher Cloud is developed by Active Cypher. SealPath is developed by SealPath. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Active Cypher Cypher Cloud integrates with Microsoft, Dropbox, AWS, ShareFile, Box and 1 more. SealPath integrates with Microsoft Office, Microsoft 365, SharePoint, Box, Google Workspace (G-Suite) and 10 more. Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.
Active Cypher Cypher Cloud and SealPath serve similar Data Loss Prevention use cases: both are Data Loss Prevention tools, both cover File Analysis. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox