AccessMatrix UAS vs swIDch FIDO: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AccessMatrix UAS

Mid-market and enterprise teams standardizing on vendor-agnostic authentication will find AccessMatrix UAS valuable for avoiding lock-in while supporting biometrics, FIDO2, and hardware security modules in parallel. The platform handles 100 million plus user scale and integrates with token vendors from OneSpan to Thales without custom engineering, which matters when you're already managing heterogeneous hardware across regions. Skip this if your organization needs out-of-the-box connectors to your existing identity provider; AccessMatrix is an authentication server, not a replacement for your IAM platform.

swIDch FIDO

Startups and SMBs shipping mobile-first applications need swIDch FIDO to avoid the phishing liability that comes with password-dependent authentication; passwordless FIDO2 with local biometric storage means you're not transmitting sensitive data to a server, which cuts the attack surface where most breaches happen. The SDK supports fingerprint, face, PIN, and pattern auth across hybrid deployments, giving you flexibility without forcing architectural rework. Skip this if your organization needs server-side biometric processing or deep integration with legacy directory services; swIDch is built for new implementations, not retrofitting Okta or Active Directory ecosystems.