AbuseIPDB vs Lunar: 2026 Comparison
AbuseIPDB is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Small security teams and MSPs protecting multiple customer networks should start with AbuseIPDB's free tier for fast IP reputation lookups backed by crowdsourced abuse reports from over 150,000 users. The free API tier with no seat limits makes it a low-friction addition to existing SOC workflows, and the reported 99.9% uptime keeps it reliable for real-time block list feeds. Skip this if you need attribution depth or geopolitical context around threat actors; AbuseIPDB tells you an IP is bad, not why or who's behind it.
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
