SecurityGate Risk Assessments for CI vs SecurityGate.io: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

SecurityGate Risk Assessments for CI

Mid-market and enterprise security teams responsible for OT/ICS environments should pick SecurityGate Risk Assessments for CI because it eliminates the assessment fragmentation that kills compliance programs: 20+ pre-built frameworks plus a custom builder with 4,000+ control questions means you stop wrestling with spreadsheets and actually track risk in one place. The centralized workflow for data collection, review, and vendor collaboration addresses NIST GV.OC and ID.RA coverage directly, which matters when regulators ask how you know what you own and what threatens it. This isn't for greenfield deployments or teams that only need point-in-time assessments; SecurityGate is built for organizations running continuous OT/ICS risk programs across multiple sites.

SecurityGate.io

Industrial operators and mid-market security teams managing multiple facilities or business units should start with SecurityGate.io for its native business impact analysis, which models how ransomware, supply chain, and insider threats actually cascade through operations instead of just listing assets. The 20 pre-built frameworks plus custom module builder means you're not forcing your risk program into a vendor's template, and portfolio analysis across facilities catches the trends that spreadsheets miss. Skip this if you need continuous monitoring or threat detection; SecurityGate.io is assessment and remediation workflow, not a sensor layer.