cPacket Unified Observability Platform vs Nubeva SKI: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

cPacket Unified Observability Platform

Enterprise and mid-market security teams that need forensic-grade packet visibility across hybrid infrastructure will get the most from cPacket Unified Observability Platform, particularly when incident response teams need to reconstruct attacks after the fact. It captures 100% of packets at line rate up to 100Gbps across on-premise, cloud, and hybrid environments, and its packet brokering architecture eliminates the sampling gaps that plague competing tools during high-traffic incidents. Skip this if your priority is real-time threat hunting with minimal latency or you need native SIEM integration; cPacket prioritizes post-incident forensics and analytics over live detection workflows.

Nubeva SKI

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need to inspect encrypted traffic without touching application code will find Nubeva SKI's memory-based session key extraction valuable, particularly for threat hunting in hybrid environments where traditional decryption approaches create operational friction. The read-only sensor architecture and support for multiple deployment formats, including containers and C libraries, means you can inject this into running processes without recompilation or downtime. This tool prioritizes detection over prevention; if your team expects it to block threats in real time, you'll be disappointed, and very small organizations will struggle to justify the operational overhead of managing key infrastructure.